Discrimination of Female Candidates bu Police Departments Assignment

Discrimination of Female Candidates bu Police Departments - Assignment Example I believe this is clearly not an accurate analysis. The role of a police officer can never change. It can expand though, which is more likely to be the scenario now. Conflict resolution, communication skills, and problem-solving abilities have become more critical and hence, it is crucial to assess the candidate’s abilities in these areas. But that certainly does not mean physical confrontation is no longer a part of the job of a police officer of today. Hence, using physical standards to judge a candidate’s abilities will always remain in practice, regardless of how people feel about it. It is true that on the first attempt, most female candidates tend to fail these physical standards at a much higher rate than men. According to the U.S. Justice Department, their rates were 80 percent lower than their male counterparts between 2005 and 2011. Hence, obviously, these kinds of tests tend to reduce the number of eligible females at a higher rate than males. The LAPD, which works to increase women representation in all areas, argues that physical standards such as bench-pressing and the ‘wall’ are pretty useless and discriminatory when it comes to the practice field, so such tests should be removed from the induction exams, so they can easily achieve the desired 43 percent female hiring goal. Law enforcement agencies, however, argue that their fitness criteria are made according to the standards of the job requirement, and not of those of any male or female. This is actually understandable since an agency would want never want to hire an unfit candidate. It is also true that the rate at which females pass the remediation test is nearly equal to that of the male candidates.